|
MORE FOCUS ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION YEAR 2006 Communication Deadline Social Cohesion and Social Services Results of Grundtvig Thematic Seminar Community Mediation Development of Civil Society Energetic Exchange A Citizens' Agenda 5th European Meeting of People Experiencing Poverty Communication on Social Services Community Development Comment From declaration to action: a review Lifelong Learning for whose Community? Spring Summit of EU leaders The future of Europe Communication on Social and Health Services of General Interest Social Europe - Structural Funds - Why should Community Development care? Implications of European reforms for Community Development Berlin Process goes to Strasbourg New Roadmap for gender inequality European Commission Consultation on unemployed Manifesto on Volunteering Social rights for migrants - local, regional, European Services Directive Human Rights of Roma Expert Group on Ethnic Minorities EAPN meets with Commissioner Spidla Violence at the European Parliament Development of Civil Society New Site for Roma Structural Funds Lobby Preparing for Equality? Communication Deadline
The deadline for comments on the European Commission a White Paper on Communication is 30th September 2006. It is worth noting that words and phrases such as Development of Civil Society or Participatory Democracy or Active Citizenship, which have been key to Community Development practice for some time, now occur with greater frequency in European policy. The search for core principles, based on Inclusiveness, Diversity and Participation in the White Paper, also has striking similarities to the work of members of the Combined Bureau for Social Development (see TLCD section for Community Development principles).
"Communication is essential to a healthy democracy" but it must be more than verbal and must give opportunity for more involvement for citizens in shaping social and community life not only endorsing the decisions of experts. The challenge of including people who experience discrimination, poverty and other forms of exclusion is growing not diminishing. More commitment to deliver results that demonstrate links between better communication and greater social cohesion within member state and between member states could be a starting point. Comment directly to ec.europa.eu/communication_white_paper/
Social Cohesion and Social Services
CEBSD members are exploring the contribution of Community Development to a European debate on Social Cohesion. Within some member states, where Community Development has been incorporated into local government services, there is a tendency to restrict Community Development to the development of social services. Members of Combined Bureau see Community Development as part of the broader context of building participatory democracy. In addressing this debate, members plan to develop a shared understanding of different interpretations of Social Cohesion. (See CEBSD news)
Results of Grundtvig Thematic Seminar
There is a commitment to establishing a network of those interested in exchange on Training and Learning for Community Development, arising from the Budapest Seminar and follow-up meeting in Rome, June 2006. The first step is to maintain and increase contact through the cebsd e-group. Send an e-mail to co-ordinator@cebsd.org if you are interested in a full copy of the report for outline of the report on the Thematic Seminar funded through the Grundtvig programme of the European Directorate for Education and Culture and/or in participating in further exchange on this topic. For more information go to the TLCD section.
Community Mediation
Two members of staff of Desenvolupament Comunitari , Catalunya, Spain, have won and award for an article on Community Mediation. The article describes mediation between local residents and local shops from an intercultural perspective. (Click here) Development of Civil Society
The Combined European Bureau is one of the bodies instrumental in producing the Budapest Declaration in 2004. A project on Training and Learning for Community Development, funded under the Grundtvig Programme, European Commission, Education and Culture.(See TLCD section on this site for more information.)There are also a number of current European initiatives where there is opportunity to follow up on the articles in this declaration on the contribution of Community Development to the development of civil society. The following organisations or networks have comments and/or consultations on transparency and the involvement of citizens in civil society. A first step to improving the dialogue would be to find creative ways to combine the work of these groups and others and disseminate it to those who are currently unaware of the debates.
Energetic Exchange
Participants in a European exchange on follow-up the CEBSD led Grundtvig project on Training and Learning for Community Development had an energetic exchange of views in Rome. Diane Cesarin of the Movimento Cooperazione Educativa, MOVEMENT OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATION, stated a core principle of their movement that "Each individual has value but also limits which can be surpassed by co-operation." Having stablished shared principles and common ground, partners made commitments to develop a network on training and learning for Community Development and explore possibilities of further exchange. (See TLCD link on this site for more) A Citizens' Agenda
'A Citizens' Agenda' is the title of a European Commission Communication, which sets out their proposals in response to "No" votes to the Constitutional Treaty in France and Netherlands. The Commission suggests a step-by-step approach based on shared policy commitments. EU leaders should launch this in 2007. The Communication is still based on an economic-dominated model but does see the role for "a social dimension in parallel and close coordination with the single market review". It emphasizes Citizens' rights and ways of increasing awareness of those rights. Another communication is concerned with the low level of knowledge and interest in how EU institutions operate with a commitment to more involvement of citizens in the policy process. The Social Platform makes the following assessment of these initiatives:
5th European Meeting of People Experiencing Poverty
The '5th European Meeting of people experiencing poverty' took place in Brussels in mid-May. At the opening Ms Ursula Haubner, Austrian Federal Minister for Social Security, Generations and Consumer Protection expressed her hope that the meeting "will lead to a more determined effort to cooperate at EU level to reach the objective of making a decisive impact on the eradication of poverty by 2010". The meeting, organised as part of the Austrian presidency, with the support of the European Commission and the assistance of the European Anti Poverty Network (EAPN), brought together more than 120 delegates from 27 European Countries to dialogue with over 40 representatives of policy makers from EU and Member State institutions. Delegates faced the challenge of how to turn the reporting process that takes place nationally through National Action Plans on Social Inclusion from a bureaucratic process into an active one which engages the commitment, skills and concerns of people who have direct experience of poverty or exclusion. For more information contact www.eapn.org Communication on Social Services
The European Social Platform has welcomed the European Commission's Communication on Social Services of General Interest, issued at the end of April. "The Communication presents for the first time a list of these services' specific characteristics and reviews the support which they receive from various existing community instruments. It also opens up a process of wide consultation, open to all actors of the sectors, Member States, Social Partners, NGOs and operators of social services, through which the Commission will better take into account the specificities of those services when implementing EU legislation. These services differ from country to country, but can include sectors such as social housing, childcare or services towards families and persons in need." (Social Platform, Press Release April 2006)
State provision and 'private' provision
Those involved in community development have a particular perspective on the tensions between state provision of social services and the increasing 'private' provision of services including services provided by large not-for-profit organisations. EU internal market and competition law now applies to many of these services. The Communication looks at the principle of freedom to provide services, freedom of establishment and also the issue of state aid to social services. Some of special characteristics of social services distinguish them from other services such as transport. The role of not-for-profit organisations and the goal of seeking broad participation of citizens in the design and delivery of such services are of particular interest to the field of community development.
Escalation of costs of social welfare
Successful community development can prevent escalation of costs of social welfare by replacing dependence with active engagement of citizens in the social process as community activists, tenants, volunteers, community workers, social workers, teachers, health workers. Good practice in community development can take significant pressure off social services in the achievement of its main goal of increasing social cohesion. This potential of Community Development also presents a risk as Community Development theory with its foundation in self-help, voluntary activity, emphasis on civil society and citizen co-operation can be hijacked by those interested in evading responsibility for social cohesion and devolving it to the most powerless and vulnerable groups in society. Good community development is not a substitute for provision of well-designed and accessible social services but is dependent on their existence and is complementary to them. Successful community development, based on core principles of tolerance, equality, diversity, partnership, solidarity, co-operation and participation has the role of changing the dynamic between the so-called 'target' group, 'client' or 'user' and the 'provider' within the given social context.
Community Development Comment
(community development, devéloppement solidaire, dezvoltare comunitara, samhällsarbete och Mobilisering, desenvolupament Comunitari, komunitneho rozvoja Samenlevingsopbouw, desarrollo comunitario, gemeinwesenarbeit, områdesutveckling) has been low on the European agenda as it is not directly concerned with economic development and emphasises solidarity and social development. It raises the difficult questions around multiple causes of social exclusion. However it is increasingly acknowledged that solidarity and social development in civil society are an important preliminary to economic development and entrepreneurial activity. These preliminary steps to successful development are often neglected by public authorities, locally, regionally and nationally and are rarely resourced in an effective way. The costs of such neglect can be increasingly high dependence on social welfare, increasing gaps between rich and poor, increasing gaps between powerful and powerless and inevitably community conflict. Study of Social Services In the light of the diversity of provision of social services of general interest in each Member State, the Commission has decided to carry out a study of the situation in each Member State and to engage in a process of consultation. The first report is anticipated at the end of 2007. The Social Platform has expressed reservations about this decision as it "will accumulate delays in finding a sustainable solution to ensure that social services are taken into account when laws and policies are developed." It also seems likely that the lack of a legal instrument relating to the provision of social services of general interest will continue to create problems. For more on the Communication go to: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/emplweb/news/news_en.cfm?id=153
From declaration to action: a review
In 2004, CEBSD along with IACD, HACD and CEE Citizen's Network produced the Budapest declaration. It is now time to review that declaration and to make it more effective. The first articles to be reviewed are those on Training and Learning for Community Development (The articles relating to Training and Learning are extracted in the TLCD section of the website.) There is also particular interest in further discussion on an intercultural perspective on Community Development and on conflict and mediation. Those who are interested in further networking on training and learning for Community Development should contact Margo Gorman, CEBSD co-ordinator, margogorman@eircom.net Lifelong Learning for whose Community?
Participants at a Seminar on Budapest at the beginning of April worked together to combine the perspective of Community Development on lifelong learning and the perspective of Adult education on lifelong learning. The Seminar was a key point in the project on "Training and Learning for Community Development", funded by the European Commission's Education and Culture Directorate under the Grundtvig Programme.
![]() Participation at the Budapest Seminar was weighted towards non-governmental organisations engaged in Training and Learning for Community Development. This reflects the conviction of partners that community development can make a unique contribution to the field of lifelong learning based on experience of training and learning in community-based organisations combined with adaptability to diversity. Community development values, practices and creativity can bring the policies and theories of lifelong learning to life. (Go to Social Development or click here for shared definitions of 'community'. The goals of the project are to work on guidelines and networking around the theme of Training and Learning for Community Development. There was a general agreement that the best guidelines are points of reference, which can illuminate practice and can be adapted to the specific situation.
Many of the non-governmental organisations, which took part, have links with local authorities. For example, participants from Rome, Berlin, Oslo and Barcelona -some of them employees of both governmental and non-governmental organisations are working on partnerships within a community development framework. In addition, participation from Communities Scotland, a Scottish/UK government initiative helped bridge the gap between government initiatives and community-based programmes. One of the most striking features of participation was that, while participation was spread across 17 countries, and people used their specific 'in-country' experience, there was none of the demarcation between East and West that is apparent at some events.
One of the participants described the seminar as "creative, it sparkled with new thinking, it broadened my understanding." This enthusiasm of the participants was evident as most were happy with the opportunity to take up key roles. Although there are some, who would have appreciated more support in maximising their participation. Participants produced 6700 words and several diagrams of working notes on common elements in training and learning in addition to evaluation commentary. These notes can be made available for those who wish to make a contribution to transforming the 'raw material' into a framework, which is open to further development.
The term 'raw material' is used, as participants were hesitant that the tight timescale of the project could produce "guidelines" or even the outline of a "framework". The working notes are described as points of reference, guidance, or "illuminators". The next challenge is to test whether a synthesis of these working notes can provide material, which is useful enough to both participants and to others in the field of Community Development and Adult Education. The test of that will be in the follow-up work of partners in the project before the next meeting in Rome in June and the willingness to participate in a future network on the theme of Training and Learning for Community Development. Contact margogorman@eircom.net if you wish to have further information about the project or proposed network.
Spring Summit of EU leaders
The European Social Platform responded positively to the outcome of the Spring Summit of the EU's leaders in March as reported by Simon Wilson to members, "Although much remains to be done to put social cohesion at the heart of the EU's policies, over the last year we have succeeded in convincing politicians that it is simply unacceptable to ignore social cohesion, and leave the fight against poverty, discrimination and inequalities to one side in order to focus solely on growth and jobs. The Spring Summit conclusions acknowledge this, and the challenge will now be to hold the EU to account for its promises - including an annual report to the Spring Summit on inclusion and social protection." For more information and follow-up on this outcome, go to www.socialplatform.org The future of Europe
You are invited to join a discussion on the future of Europe, which takes place in 20 languages on a website of the European Commission. The promotion of "Dialogue, Debate and Democracy" is part of the response to a call by the European Council for a period of reflection following the negative votes in France and The Netherlands on the proposed Constitutional Treaty. The address of the Discussion is: http://europa.eu.int/debateeurope Communication on Social and Health Services of General Interest
The Social Platform has published a contribution to the proposed Communication on Social and Health Services of General Interest which was originally announced in July 2004 but has been delayed by debates on how social services should relate to the European Union rules on competition and the internal market. The Social Platform calls for a legal instrument, which would clarify how social services, relates to the EU legal framework. It also calls for a monitoring and analysis process "to establish how the sector can be best organised to guarantee high quality services for users." The Social Platform contribution explores definitions, the implications of a legal instrument, organisation within the context of trends in the Social Services sector and an exploration of issues on monitoring, and establishing assessment of quality. See www.socialplatform.org Social Europe - Structural Funds - Why should Community Development care?
In the light of developments in relation to the Lisbon Strategy, the meeting of the European Council at the end of March 2006 is an important date for many NGOs. The Social Platform has issued a resolution, which "insists on the need for Europe to identify its real priorities (which must include avoiding social dumping, fighting against poverty, social exclusion and discrimination, more democracy) and to use the right instruments (OMC on social protection and social inclusion, European Pact for Gender Equality, Youth Pact, anti-discrimination directives). We hope that Heads of State and Government will also be convinced of the need to address these most pressing concerns and really respond to the growing scepticism of citizens towards the European Union" For a full text of the resolution go to www.socialplatform.org
Leading up to the Spring Council, Non Government Organisations (NGO's) and Unions urged EU leaders to make the renewed Lisbon Strategy work for truly sustainable communities in Europe. On the 6th Match 2006 at a Conference entitled, "Does the Lisbon Process produce sustainable development?" organised by the Social Platform, European Trades Union Congress, and European Environmental Bureau in Brussels, President Barroso affirmed that the growth and jobs agenda of the Lisbon strategy could only work hand in hand with social goals. NGOs are hoping that we are beginning to see a more balanced approach within the Lisbon strategy that also seems to be reflected in the European Commission's annual report 2006 - which notes:
"The European Council should clearly state that the objective of the Lisbon Strategy is to strengthen social cohesion and sustainability throughout Europe by making the Union the most dynamic, competitive, sustainable, knowledge-based economy, enjoying full employment. A strategy for sustainable change facing up to demographic change and challenges of the global economy, and allowing for the necessary reforms to increase competitiveness and growth across Europe, while at the same time helping people face these changes by providing them with adequate social protection, promoting social inclusion, ensuring training and education opportunities." Implications of European reforms for Community Development
In the following commentary, Sue Webb of CDF UK and present at the above conference, highlights some of the issues the Lisbon strategy raises for Community Development with a focus on civil dialogue and funding of the community sector. Have you heard of the National Reform Programme 2005? Or the National Strategic Reference Framework? (NSRF) Probably not - but these two documents are possible the two most significant documents that will influence the development of communities within Europe for the next seven years. Most of the National Reform Programmes should now be with the Commission and these documents should play an important role in the strengthening the political responsibility of member states in delivering the Lisbon Strategy. Very few member states consulted with NGOs in drawing up their programmes and when consultation was undertaken it was mostly high level, superficial, with no clear process and lacked transparency. What was lacking was civil dialogue and for many Member States this involves an understanding of engagement and process - a key goal for Community Development. The National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)- will establish the strategy for the implementation of the structural funds within the UK and other member states during the next funding period -2007-2013. Each member state will have to submit its own NSRF. Over a third of the EU budget goes to the structural and cohesion funds so the framework and criteria for administering these funds will have direct bearing on key issues such as poverty, sustainability, equality, the environment and development on all levels from local to national and of course at European level. The delivery of the Structural Funds programme will essentially define the UK's approach to the EU Cohesion policy as that is implemented in the UK. The next round of structural and cohesion funds hold great implications for the future and shape of a Europe, especially a social Europe and the work and interests of the Voluntary and Community - civil society, in terms of sustainability, and cohesion, solidarity and partnershipThe DTI is co-ordinating the consultation for the UK's National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) and a draft NSRF is out for consultation now. The consultation began on 28 February 2006 and will end on 22 May 2006. Community Development Foundation will be preparing a response indicating the need for a balanced approach to growth and jobs that includes social protection and solutions. Report from Sue.webb@cdf.org.uk Manager European and International Unit It would be valuable if other organisations also prepared a response. For further information visit the DTI website. www.dti.gov.uk/europe/future_of_funds. Berlin Process goes to Strasbourg
The Berlin Process was initiated by the German Federal Ministry for Families, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth in co-operation with the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe and the Directorate for Youth and Sport of the Council of Europe to develop integrated strategies to benefit children and young people in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Last month, the charter developed in Berlin was revisited by an even larger contingent of elected members of municipalities, youth representatives, youth researchers, experts, non-governmental associations and civil servants.
The Berlin process is set in the context of the Lisbon agenda of commitment to a knowledge-based society, full employment and social cohesion. Set against these goals are current employment trends which make disadvantaged young people potentially superfluous to the labour market. The gap between young people from advantaged backgrounds who can achieve their potential and those facing insurmountable obstacles to achievement is growing. This imbalance is potentially dangerous to social cohesion. Groups discussed a range of issues including co-operation between public and private institutions, interculturality and minorities, xenophobia and violence, participation and education for democracy, non-formal education, employment and qualification. The Berlin Process attracts broader participation and exchange from other European member states working on integrated strategies at a local and regional level. Contact Antje Klemm, Entwicklung und Chancen junger Menschen in sozialen Brennpunkten, klemm@eundc.de
New Roadmap for gender inequality
Gender inequality in the EU will be tackled by 21 specific activities over the next five years, as outlined in a new gender equality roadmap published by the European Commission for Women's Day on 8th March. Proposed Commission activities in the 'Roadmap for equality between men and women 2006-10' include helping set up a new €50 million European institute for gender equality, reviewing all existing EU gender equality law, increasing awareness of gender inequality, ensuring gender equality is considered in all policies and pressing for better statistics. The roadmap aims to tackle the pay gap between men and women, support better work/life balance, eliminate violence and trafficking, support gender budgeting and promote gender equality both within and outside the EU. EU Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Commissioner, Vladimir Špidla stated that, while we must promote gender equality to those outside the EU, much remains to be done inside the Union. 'Women in the EU are still not getting a fair deal, particularly in the workplace. One in three of working women is confined to part time work. Gender equality isn't just a good idea - it liberates people's potential and plays a key role in making the EU more competitive. We need not only more jobs, but better jobs and to help women into them, while ensuring both women and men can balance work and private life.'
The roadmap sets out six priority areas for action in the 2006-2010 period:
Each objective is followed by specific key actions designed to bring the goal nearer. Actions include increasing awareness of gender equality in schools, promoting female entrepreneurship, establishing in 2007 an EU network of women in economic and political decision-making positions, publishing a Communication on the gender pay gap and highlighting gender issues during the 2007 European Year of Equal Opportunities for all.
As agreed at the occasion of last year's International Women's Day, the new European institute for gender equality should be operational by 1 January 2007. If approved, it will have a €52.5million budget for the period until 2013. The institute will be a centre of excellence for gender equality issues, providing expertise and improving knowledge. Its tasks will include raising awareness among European citizens of EU gender equality policy, gathering and analysing objective, reliable data that can be compared at EU level and the developing new methodological tools.
As well as the funds for the new gender institute, the proposed new €650 million PROGRESS programme will fund some of the activities outlined in the roadmap. EU Structural funds and financial programmes in various policy areas will also help to provide funding for both roadmap and other EU gender equality activities. The new network of national gender equality bodies will be established under the provisions of EU gender equality Directive 2002/73. They promote, analyse, monitor and fight discrimination on grounds of sex in Member States, by providing assistance to victims of discrimination and helping them to pursue their complaints. The review of existing gender equality legislation is in line with 'legislate less but better' drive of President Barroso. It will ensure that all legislation is up to date and can provide the best possible framework for ensuring equal opportunities for men and women throughout the EU. Report from Sue Webb, Cluster leader, CEBSD
European Commission Consultation on unemployed
The European Commission has issued a call on 9th March for views on what the European Union should do to mobilise those who are unemployed but capable of work and how to secure a decent standard of living for those who remain outside the labour They state that "Comprehensive social assistance policies are in place in most Member States and activation policies have been implemented to bring excluded people back to the labour market, but there is still a sizeable 'hard core' of people with little prospect of finding a job who, for that reason, remain at high risk of falling into poverty and social exclusion. The main challenge is to ensure that social protection policies effectively contribute to mobilising people who are capable of working while achieving the wider objective of providing a decent living standard to those who are and will remain outside the labour market. This consultation asks for views on what the EU should do to respond to this challenge. Deadline for comments is 19th April 2006. http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/emplweb/news/news_en.cfm?id=138 Manifesto on Volunteering
The European Volunteer Centre (CEV) launches its revised "Manifesto on Volunteering in Europe" at the European Parliament by invitation of Jo Leinen MEP. "This event seeks to raise awareness amongst European decision makers on the importance of volunteering at different levels and we will present our claims that we have towards the European Union to recognize, promote and support volunteering and networking, " says CEV representative. For a copy of the manifesto in English, French or German see www.cev.be Social rights for migrants - local, regional, European
Within the framework of its new 4-year programme (2005-2008), the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions continues its activities on the integration of migrants in Europe by planning a joint initiative on the role of local authorities in the integration of migrants in Europe with the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities (Congress) in the Council of the Europe (CoE) and the city of Stuttgart. Within the framework of its new 4-year programme (2005-2008), the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions continues its activities on the integration of migrants in Europe by planning a joint initiative on the role of local authorities in the integration of migrants in Europe with the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities (Congress) in the Council of the Europe (CoE) and the city of Stuttgart. www.eurofound.ie" target="_blank" title="Within the framework of its new 4-year programme (2005-2008), the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions continues its activities on the integration of migrants in Europe by planning a joint initiative on the role of local authorities in the integration of migrants in Europe with the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities (Congress) in the Council of the Europe (CoE) and the city of Stuttgart. www.eurofound.ie
Services Directive
On 16th February Members of the European Parliament voted to exclude Social Services from the controversial 'Directive on Internal Market in Services' "The Social Platform and its members were part of a successful Europe-wide campaign for 'Social Services of General Economic Interest' to be excluded from the scope of the directive. "The Commission has a responsibility to respect the wish of the European Parliament, the EU's only directly-elected institution" said Anne-Sophie Parent, President of the Europe-wide Social Platform. "Social NGOs around Europe now expect the Commission's revised proposal to exclude social services, in line with the MEPs' vote." On behalf of the Social Platform, Ms Roumet also called on the European Commission "to publish as soon as possible its announced Communication on social and health services of general interest - there is no excuse for any more delays. This Communication will advance the EU's understanding of the social services sector in Europe and help clarify how social services should be dealt with in EU internal market and competition rules".
Human Rights of Roma
The Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Alvaro Gil-Robles, presented today his final report on the human rights situation of the Roma, Sinti and Travellers in Europe. The Roma are present in virtually all member states of the Council of Europe and comprise approximately ten million people. In most of the countries the Commissioner has visited, the Roma populations face considerable obstacles to the full enjoyment of their fundamental rights.
The report calls for active partnerships of all authorities, institutions and people concerned, including the Roma themselves, for putting into place the measures needed for ensuring the full respect of human rights of Roma, Sinti and Travellers. Protocol 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights related to non-discrimination and the Equality Directive of the European Union provide a sound legal foundation for these efforts.
The final report is available on the website of the Commissioner for Human Rights, www.commissioner.coe.int. Contact: John DALHUISEN, Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights Tel. +33 (0)3 88 41 23 13, mobile +33 (0) 6 61 14 70 37
E-mail: john.dalhuisen@coe.int
Expert Group on Ethnic Minorities
The EU Commission has established an Expert Group on Ethnic Minorities This group will analyse the social inclusion of ethnic minorities in the European Union and will propose strategies for tackling discrimination. The group of experts will also focus on issues such as good practices in the integration of disadvantaged groups in the labour market. Before the end of 2007, it will propose policy recommendations on how the EU can approach the problems of social and labour market exclusion for disadvantaged minorities.
The Commission's Framework strategy for tackling discrimination highlighted the need for special attention to positive and innovative approaches which would overcome systemic obstacles faced by disadvantaged ethnic minorities and called for establishment of the high level group. The Commission also emphasized the difficult situation faced by the Roma throughout Europe in terms of employment, education, housing and other fields. Source ERIO. www.erio.net
EAPN meets with Commissioner Spidla
At a meeting on 16th February, with Vladimir Spidla European Commissioner for Employment, Social affairs and Equal opportunities, the European Anti Poverty Network (EAPN) highlighted the strong message on the social dimension of the Lisbon Strategy coming from the Informal Social Affairs Council in Villach. Ludo Horemans, Vice-President of EAPN stressed "the need for the Commission to really act to ensure that the Strategy on social inclusion is relaunched with a high degree of visibility, and that the social dimension is mainstreamed in all policies and instruments, including the employment strategy, the Services Directive and the regulations on the Structural Funds" More info: Vincent Forest, Information Officer European Anti Poverty Network (EAPN) E-mail: vincent.forest@eapn.skynet.be website: www.eapn.org
Violence at the European Parliament
The violence that met the opening sessions of the European Parliament in Strasbourg is an indicator of the increasing frustration of in the European Union at the lack of progress on the European Social and Economic model promised in Lisbon. In January 2006, it was dockers and port workers who protested over European Commission proposals to make working conditions at EU ports more open to the 'free' market. There are many other groups whose resentment simmers away quietly at the failure to find a European model of economic and social development that caters for the diversity of all its citizens rather than as worker units, dependents, welfare recipients, trouble makers on the one hand and wealth creators on the other. Another example of where the opening up of the market threatens social solidarity and social cohesion is the Services Directive. "As this Directive is currently worded, social services like child-care, support services for disabled people, adult education, social housing, homes for elderly people or ambulance services will be opened up to the free market and subject to the country of origin principle (whereby companies can provide services in one country under the regulations and conditions of another where they are registered) in the same way as commercial services like mobile phones or banking companies. As it stands this Directive contains a threat to quality and access to social services, particularly for those on low incomes who cannot afford private services," (Robin Hanan European Anti-Poverty Network)
Development of Civil Society
It is important that frustration of citizens on issues that affect them directly is fuelled by information and analysis and channelled into actions where they can be part of a sustainable economic and social model. The Combined European Bureau for Social Development has played an active role in the development of civil society with particular emphasis on local, regional and national engagement with social development in Europe. Board Members share a common understanding of the development of "community" at a local and regional level and with regard to communities of interest or identity. Since its inception in 1990, CEBSD has developed a model of organisation which uses co-ordination and teamwork based on diversity of contribution, culture and background. Small amounts of funding to support social inclusion and social cohesion can make a difference. The Combined European Bureau for Social Development has responded to a call for Proposals to support bodies working in the field of active citizenship (DGEAC No 59/05, Community Action Programme). With additional funding, CEBSD could extend a model of working in co-operation, which can involve the diversity of interests in creative solutions to current challenges. Groups interested in participation in the CEBSD programme of activities, should contact Margo Gorman on margogorman@eircom.net.
New Site for Roma
The European Commission has opened a new website for Roma which gives information on the different policies, programmes and initiatives to promote social inclusion and combat discrimination against Roma. It is set within the framework of in context of EC anti-discrimination measures. It provides useful information information, documents, links and contacts on EU initiatives on Roma. (See europa.eu.int/comm/Roma For those who want to keep up to date news from Roma including the catalogue of human rights violations all over Europe, they should consult www.erionet.org, the website of the European Roma Information Office, which is also a member of the Social Platform.
Structural Funds Lobby
The compromise on decisions about the Structural Funds 2007-2013 in December 2005 by the Council Presidency poses a serious threat to partnership with civil society and limits public scrutiny of how the funds are spent. The Social Platform, of which CEBSD is a member, has issued a statement to express the deep concern of civil society organisations on the wording suggested by the compromise as it "seriously dilutes the partnership principle". Non-governmental organisations across Europe need to join this lobby in order to influence the review of the compromise reached. See www.socialplatform.org
Preparing for Equality?
One of the agreed actions from the strategy on anti-discrimination has nominated 2007 as the European Year for Equal Opportunities. Is it possible that this year could be part of a sustained strategy where initiatives, projects and events include commitment to follow-up on recommendations, proposals and good intentions? They do say that they will build on an learn from the achievements of previous European Years, in particular the 1997 European Year Against Racism and the 2003 European Year of People with Disabilities, as well as the European information campaign: "For diversity - against discrimination".
More focus on the European Commission:Year 2006, Year 2005, |