Tailored support to community groups

training in Stoke on Trent

ADEPT has, with local community groups, developed a modular course - 'Working in Community Organisations'. The course is available accredited through the open College Network or in a workshop format.

Stand-alone modules can be delivered, or a combination of aspects of different modules creating a tailor-made package.

We are regularly commissioned to provide bespoke packages to support groups in their development and sustainability, by supporting them to arrive at their own solutions while achieving knowledge and skills for group members during this process.

Open College Network logo

ADEPT is an approved centre for the Open College Network, which ensures all of our training is delivered within a clear quality standard.

It also gives us the flexibility to provide tailor-made accredited training that is responsive to the needs of a community group and the individuals within it.

The changing nature of local communities and neighbourhoods makes it increasingly important to provide support that is flexible, adaptable and responsive to individual and community needs.

groups in action logo

ADEPT has developed a dedicated resource for groups in the form of a website - groupsinaction.com .

This provides a range of materials including examples and templates, while offering steps, suggestions and things to avoid, as part of an ongoing resource.

We have also developed a learning module entitled "Facilitate your Group" aimed at those members of community groups who wish to provide additional support to new members or to extend the membership of their group.

This is available in a paper work book format at present, and is being developed as a web resource, and then as an e-learning accredited package.


Presentation from Haringay Council

 

 


Presentation from Hungary

I am working for the Hungarian Association for Community Development and the Civil College Foundation, which is an adult educational institution.

Both of them are nation-wide organizations and working on three levels.

On the local level, we are initiating local development processes on a long term basis, where through CD methodology and trainings we are enforcing planning and local action.

On the national level, we are linking the local initiatives by networking, and we are influencing the development of new civic structures by help to create various formal and informal ways of cooperation. We are influencing the policy making processes too on the National and international level.

Related to the profession, we are developing methods, making publications on the results of our activities, we are running a Civic Radio and an internet based community database, we are developing training courses and running trainings all over Hungary.

On the international level we are members of different European networks, running international projects on various issues, and influencing the policy making procedures.

 

We organized the previous relay in Hungary, which was already reported. There was a possibility to introduce the results of the Bp. Relay, so I presented the main topics and details of the agenda. At the end of the report we collected the main points and results of the Relay, what I highlighted in London too:

During the meeting we expressed some important key points related to our understanding (and the TLCD project) and also about our possible common efforts for training and learning in the future. We all felt that for the issue of sharing among us, it was really important that we made space to get to know each other’s national and professional contexts and history. That helped a lot to recognise the similarities and differences and also to realise what we can bring back to home from each other.

Sharing about our frameworks was also helpful to recognise the different focus points and actors within our societies, which/who are the most responsible in the change of people’s attitude on the different levels. We agreed that our task also includes the support of grassroots initiatives, but we also have a responsibility to influence these actor’s activity and cooperation with each other (we defined some, as the general education, adult education, helper and developer professions – community, rural, cultural, social professionals etc. - and the state both on the national and European level).

We need such policies and support which are making possible real participation in which people can really take over the responsibility on their lives and empowered properly to this participation. This cannot go without influencing policy on each level in the society and Europe for gaining good opportunities which can be seized both local activists and CD professionals.

It seems that it worth to link these national efforts on a European level, where our basis can be the Budapest declaration in a more strategic way, more concrete on the educational aspect.

It also can be a formalized group (an international Alliance?) which collects, attracts and influences the key actors responsible for civil society development. 

 

It also came out, that we are all involved and we all are implementing long term processes in our work but the present situation needs a special focus from CD and adult education to be more action oriented too. It means that reflective steps are needed from our profession towards the key actors in policy making and implementing, and through trainings we also have to support directly the local action.

 

More notes from the final discussion:

 

-          Within TLCD we should try to bring back the bigger issues. We are thinking a lot in contents and methodology (what is very important), but we should try to focus on the bigger analysis that you work from (the community itself, unemployment, disabilities, economics, rights) - this big issues should be emphasised within training. That also helps to avoid to use CD as a tool by the hand of the power, which is helpful to increase people’s “happiness” instead of dealing with real problems

-          Use an analysis to link local concerns to wider structures, issues

-          Facing our work, we have to make a balance, that besides developing trainings on professional issues (training professionals), we have to support active citizens directly, the active citizen should be supported. The professionals have to be more prepared (and their education should focus on that) about how to support active citizens, rather than using the toolkits they already have. Need to concentrate and focus on people in communities, developing active citizens, whether working with professionals or communities/politicians

-          This has an implication for training methods and contents, they should be more action oriented (e.g. Saul Alinsky – Rules for radicals)

-          But there is a tendency to simplify the world everywhere (quick knowledge, very practical, simplifying structures, pictures, summaries, guidelines etc.) which represents an attitude avoiding the “deep” and the realization of the deeper relations, so that is why the CD training is very important on the University level as a part of various studies

-          Important to look at history and key developments of community work in order to better understand current context and influence future developments

-          Be explicit about the values+beliefs+visionvalue oriented community development – how our values shine in our practice?

-          Focus on power-powerless+need of those excluded. Have an analysis of power, who has it, who doesn’t, how it is used?